The
greater North
Pacific region is one of the world’s most important fisheries. Recent
dramatic
decreases in the numbers of many species in this region have perplexed
biologists, caused sweeping and under-informed management decisions,
and are
provoking cultural disintegration of many Alaska Native villages. But 20th
century data show clearly that there have been other periods of low
productivity for species, often followed by periods of abundance, as do
paleoecological and archaeological data from the last 5000 years. The
global
problem is thus: under varying population cycles of humans, salmon,
groundfish,
sea mammals, birds, and many other species in the North Pacific region,
and
with varying harvest by the higher trophic levels, how do we
sustain populations,
ecosystems, and the peoples and cultures who depend on them for social,
political, economic, and cultural identity?
Most modern investigations of this
question have had limited temporal
data. For
example, study of possible long-term cycles in populations of Steller
sea lions
on the North Pacific was handicapped by limited and short-term data,
although
cycles may be much longer. Further, attempts to model the effects of
human
fishing on the population dynamics of e.g., cod, Pollock, or sea lions
typically begin with an assumed prefishing or prehunting state.
However, humans
have harvested large quantities of these species for thousands of
years; thus,
there would appear to be no ecologically-meaningful time period without
humans,
at least not since deglaciation 12,000 ybp, and archaeological data
provide the
essential temporal perspective.
From both anthropological and
ecological viewpoints, the roles of
humans must
be considered as one of many linkages within ecosystems that include
other
biotic components, as well as abiotic constraints and drivers. A
sweeping Science
article (Jackson et al. 2001) suggests large-scale roles of humans in
ecosystems, arguing that changes in marine ecosystems are complex,
systemic,
and have a long historical context. However, most of the suggested
relationships between trophic structure, species extinctions, marine
productivity, and human exploitation remain untested. Our research will
develop
methods to directly test the sorts of relationships suggested by
Jackson et
al., as well as provide fundamental data on the role of humans in
ecosystem
dynamics in the North Pacific over millennia. This project will focus
on
whole-ecosystem complexities of the region, which are founded on
predator-prey
and other food-web interactions, cultural harvesting strategies,
long-term
changes in the North Pacific ecosystem and climate, and direct human
impacts on
coastal environments.
We propose a transdisciplinary
approach to studying humans as part of
the
northern ecosystem. We will interrelate modern and prehistoric,
terrestrial and
marine, local and regional, and empirical and theoretical exploration.
We
suggest that this multidimensional approach is not only possible, but
necessary
to our understanding of the region. We suggest that the Aleut were not
simple
and passive harvesters, but were active participants in a regional
ecosystem
that included them as significant forces. The implications of this
approach are
profound and require integration of anthropology, archaeology, geology,
ecology, mathematics, climatology, and history, the perspective of many
spatial
and temporal scales, and the seamless merging of theoretical approaches
from
many fields. Since the Aleut have been harvesting resources on the
north
Pacific for thousands of years, we must include the Aleut in models and
reconstructions of this ecosystem, in which they may function as
ecosystem
engineers, as more ordinary components of food webs and landscapes, or
as
passive responders to a world that is primarily driven by largely
external
forces such as climate and geomorphic evolution. This role of people
also may
vary temporally and spatially, or with cultural context, and our work
will provide
a framework and a test case for understanding the history of people as
components of ecosystems, exploring these questions.
This project will be conducted in the
island archipelago of Sanak Island,
50 kilometers south of the tip of the Alaska Peninsula (Figure 1), and
will
draw on past and on-going work on the nearby Lower Alaska Peninsula
(LAP) and Aleutian regions. Sanak Island
is about 250 km2 in area, with 200 km of shoreline, and is
the
largest island of its archipelago. Caton Island
is half Sanak’s
size, and there are numerous smaller islands and islets. The islands
have a
long archaeological record only recently investigated (see below). They
were
populated by a number of villages at Russian contact, were the center
of sea
otter harvesting in the 19th century, cod harvesting in the
early 20th
century, and supported active cattle ranches until the 1960s. The
islands are
surrounded by a massive reef system that supported some of the largest
populations of groundfish and sea mammals in the region; Captain Cook
called
them the ‘Halibut
Islands,’
because his
ships could fill their holds here in just a few days. Millions of tons
of cod
were harvested here in the early 20th century, and, today,
commercial fishermen from False
Pass
and King Cove fish
here for cod in spring or halibut in summer. These islands supported
the last
major populations of sea otters to be commercially harvested. At least
3 river
drainages have runs of sockeye, humpback, and chum salmon. Finally,
local
peoples lived on these islands for many years prior to their
abandonment in the
1960s. Families in Sand Point, King Cove, and False Pass
hold a wealth of local knowledge about the landscape. Given the
archaeological,
historic, and ethnographic data, the local knowledge of the region, and
the
relative isolation of this archipelago from the mainland peninsula, the
Sanak
Island region is a perfect location to investigate the complex dynamics
of
human-landscape relations and the role that humans have played in the
structure
of the North Pacific ecosystem over the last several thousand years.
Fig 1. The Lower
Alaska Peninsula,
Sanak archipelago, and eastern Aleutian region.

|
|